Log In / Join Now

Relaunching Ruinart

Photo by: David Yellen

Posted: Apr 10, 2007 12:10pm ET

Ruinart is the best Champagne you don't know about.

Distribution in the United States was limited from 2000 to 2005, but with a new importer, the brand was relaunched in 2006. Until then, I hadn’t tasted Ruinart Champagne since 2003. That’s a shame, because this house makes excellent Chardonnay-based bubbly in an elegant style. In particular, the vintage Dom Ruinart bottlings show plenty of finesse, yet are intense and develop well in the bottle.

With a new U.S. importer, Ruinart released its Brut Blanc de Blancs NV (90 points, $60) and Brut Rosé NV (90, $60) in time for the 2006 holiday season. Then last month, cellar master Jean-Philippe Moulin was in New York to kick off the launch of two vintage Champagnes: Brut Rosé Dom Ruinart and Brut Blanc de Blancs Dom Ruinart, both from the 1996 harvest. I tasted both non-blind (look for official reviews from blind tastings in an upcoming issue).

The blanc de blancs, which should retail for about $170, is delicate and fresh, with citrus and candied berry flavors. It reveals a firm, linear structure, courtesy of the '96 vintage’s high acidity, that is offset by a creamy texture. The long finish leaves an impression of graphite and mineral accents.

The rosé, about $400, offers subtle berry and strawberry aromas and flavors. It too is very fresh and elegant, but I detected some tannins in the texture, then the long, refined finish takes over.

What differentiates the vintage wines from the non-vintage cuvées is that all the fruit comes from estate vineyards rated grand cru in the Champagne system of village classification.

Though the blanc de blancs is 100 percent Chardonnay, 40 percent of the grapes come from the Montagne de Reims. These components of the blend add structure and longevity.

The rosé is about 85 percent Chardonnay, with roughly 15 percent still Pinot Noir added for color. Moulin credits the high percentage of Chardonnay for the house style: finesse, elegance and purity.

Moulin also believes Chardonnay is behind the aging potential of Ruinart’s top wines, but notes that it needs eight to 10 years aging on the lees before it is ready for disgorging. The long maturation period allows for a low dosage, of 6 grams to 9 grams per liter of residual sugar, depending on the year.

To prove the aging potential of the vintage Champagnes, Moulin brought a few older vintages. Of the blanc de blancs, we tasted the 1993, 1990 and 1988; the rosés consisted of 1990 and 1988.

The Brut Blanc de Blancs Dom Ruinart 1990 is beginning to show some tertiary aromas of leather and coffee. It is rich and creamy, with coffee, toast and mineral notes and a terrific finish. I also love the Brut Rosé Dom Ruinart 1990 and 1988. The ’90 reveals an exceptional bouquet of preserved berries, grilled almonds and ground coffee beans. It has power and intensity, balanced by lively acidity. The ’88 is fresh, with a coffee and toffee bouquet, candied red fruits and mineral flavors. All are drinking beautifully now.

These Champagnes also pair well with food. At least one of the seven different vintage cuvées worked beautifully with each course during a multicourse dinner at Per Se.

Tom Breneman
eau claire, WI —  April 10, 2007 9:50pm ET
Toured the House in 2004 and was very disappointed to find out they didn't have an importer at that time... alas, lugged several bottles around France and Germany in order to get some home,,, but well worth it and looking forward to seeking it out now. Tks for letting us know.
Jeffrey Ghi
New York —  April 10, 2007 10:19pm ET
How does the Ruinart compare to the charles heidsieck Blanc des Millenaires, in comparing Chard Champers as a point of reference?
Bruce Sanderson
New York —  April 11, 2007 8:51am ET
Jeffrey,Two points. First, Ruinart did not make a Blanc de Blancs in 1995. Jean-Philippe Moulin felt '95 was more of a Pinot Noir year and that the vintage did not suit the style of the house.Second, from my point of view, the Heidsieck Blanc des Millenaires is a more toasty, honeyed and opulent style, coming 100 percent from the Cote des Blancs. Ruinart's style is leaner and less opulent, at least when young, because 40 percent of the Chardonnay (in the 1996) comes from the Montagne de Reims. The Chardonnay from MdR is more austere, lending a stricter feel to the wine.
Peter Czyryca
April 11, 2007 5:24pm ET
$170 and $400?Pass.
David Williams
Carlsbad, CA —  April 12, 2007 1:27pm ET
We discovered Ruinart NV at our favorite LA restaurant--Jiraffe's--when they first opened in 1996. We would order a bottle for our appetizers everytime we would go there. Sad to say it was off the list in January.
Jeffrey Ghi
New York —  April 12, 2007 10:40pm ET
Oh, thanks very much for the info Bruce. I was trying to gauge the taste from a comparison since Ive had the Charles Heidsieck. Thanks for the tip tho, Ill have to look out for the ruinart!!!
Jennifer Awbrey
Austin, Tx —  April 13, 2007 10:36am ET
The NV ones are in a beautiful bottle. Are the vintage ones bottled the same?
Bruce Sanderson
New York —  April 16, 2007 2:26pm ET
Jennifer,Yes, the packaging is very elegant.

Would you like to comment? Want to join or start a discussion?

Become a WineSpectator.com member and you can!
To protect the quality of our conversations, only members may submit comments. Member benefits include access to more than 315,000 reviews in our Wine Ratings Search; a first look at ratings in our Insider, Advance and Tasting Highlights; Value Wines; the Personal Wine List/My Cellar tool, hundreds of wine-friendly recipes and more.

WineRatings+ app: Download now for 340,000+ ratings.