What Goes with What?

Ask the dish. Or look at your guests.
What Goes with What?
Matt Kramer considers his companions when selecting an engaging wine pairing. (Jon Moe)
Jul 5, 2017

"In the end, nothing goes with anything; it's your own taste that puts things together.”—Lucian Freud

I began my writing life as a food writer. I mention this only as a way of noting that devoted as I am to wine, I have something of a secret existence that’s almost as equally devoted to food. I just don’t write about it much.

That I have opinions about food will hardly surprise you. But what might surprise is how much I agree with—and fully endorse—the great painter Lucian Freud’s assertion cited above. In fact, I know of no other statement about “what goes with what” that expresses it better.

Freud (1922–2011) liked food and wine. A noted and hugely successful portraitist, he would reward his astonishingly patient and forbearing sitters—friends and acquaintances who were paid nothing for their often months-long time posing for him—by treating them, after a posing session, to dinner at one of several high-end London restaurants. He also liked to cook and reportedly knew his wines.

(If you’d like to get a sense of what it was like posing for him, I highly recommend Man with a Blue Scarf: On Sitting for a Portrait by Lucian Freud, by Martin Gayford.)

What I so like about Freud’s assertion is its combination of liberation (“Nothing goes with anything”) and subtle constraint (“It's your own taste that puts things together”).

Note that the artist did not say, “Anything goes with anything.” Quite the opposite. Freud didn’t become a great artist because he simply slapped things together and called it good. He knew how many subtle choices are made in order to arrive at anything—a painting, a plate of food, a wine pairing—that “works.”

All of which brings us to “putting things together.” Obviously, it’s the key. Since I do all the cooking chez Kramer and, as you might expect, also choose the wine to go with the meal, I spend a certain amount of time every day deciding what goes with what. It’s a highly pleasurable daily meditation.

What have I discovered from decades of this daily meditation? Probably my biggest lesson is not to choose a wine that you like, but rather, to choose what the dish likes.

Strange as it sounds, I often anthropomorphize the ingredient I’m working with or the dish I’m making. “What wine do you like?” I ask my food. I’m sure I could get locked up for admitting this, but I usually get answers.

Typically, the answer is something like, “I know you want a Pinot Noir because that’s what you always want. But I really want a Cabernet Franc. Or maybe a Lambrusco.”

Am I crazy? Probably yes. But when you cook enough—especially if you’re really into your ingredients—strange things start to happen in a kitchen. This is one of them.

Although Freud didn’t say so, I suspect that his notion of “your own taste” somehow included the “taste” of his paints, the lighting, and the aura, persona, whatever, of the sitter. Bottom line: It’s not just you, even though it might seem so.

The preceding wackiness works in a home kitchen where you’re the cook. But in a restaurant, where you can’t converse with the dish or its ingredients, the conversation between wine and food is necessarily constrained. How, then, do you choose?

I can only tell you what I do: I look at my dining companions. What’s more—and this may shock you—I ignore what they’ve ordered to eat. In choosing wines in restaurants, the pairing, I’ve discovered, is not “what wine goes with the food?” but instead, which wines go with the guests?

I’ve long submitted that good wines can take care of themselves. Good wines can work wonderfully with any food that is remotely plausible for them. This is why the usual “rules” are, I believe, pretty much useless. Besides, these days, given many chefs’ creative approaches to even classic dishes, you don’t really know what you’re going to get anyway.

On a more practical note, I usually order a bottle of red and a bottle of white and have both served to everyone at the same time, which solves the obvious problem.

Since both wines are I hope interesting, and maybe new to everyone at the table, this approach heightens interest in the wines. I’ve found that everyone attentively tastes both wines, regardless of what dish he or she ordered.

Those of us who love wine and food are forever contemplating what goes with what. Myself, I talk to the dish. Or look at the guests. But perhaps a good psychiatrist might say I’ve got it reversed.

Your own diagnosis is welcome.

Pairings Opinion

You Might Also Like

40 Years of Roederer Estate

40 Years of Roederer Estate

The California sparkling wine producer remains one of the best and most consistent on the …

Sep 30, 2022
Virtual Content, Real Wine: Take Two

Virtual Content, Real Wine: Take Two

After more than two years of virtual wine tastings, it's time to raise the bar on these …

Sep 30, 2022
The Chilled Reds of Summer

The Chilled Reds of Summer

Forget “room temperature” and ice those reds

Aug 2, 2022
Keeping an Open Mind on 2020

Keeping an Open Mind on 2020

All was not lost in a Napa Cabernet vintage turned upside-down by wildfires and a pandemic:…

Jul 18, 2022
A Grand Award Remembered

A Grand Award Remembered

How a covert restaurant reinspection led to great memories—and lots of Champagne

Aug 31, 2022
Portuguese Exploration

Portuguese Exploration

The Douro Valley offers unparalleled vineyard views, rich history and lovely hospitality—an…

Jul 31, 2022