Does Wine Spectator ever publish "bad" scores?

Ask Dr Vinny

Hello there! I'm Dr. Vinifera, but you can call me Vinny. Ask me your toughest wine questions, from the fine points of etiquette to the science of winemaking. And don't worry, I'm no wine snob—you can also ask me those "dumb questions" you're too embarrased to ask your wine geek friends! I hope you find my answers educational, empowering and even amusing. And don't forget to check out my most asked questions and my full archives for all my Q&A classics.

Dear Dr. Vinny,

I rarely see any wines in Wine Spectator that have scored below 85 points. Do you simply not publish the poorer scores?

—Michael, Noblesville, Ind.

Dear Michael,

I think your observations represent a few things that have come into play, the first of which is the great news that the quality of wine available in the United States has dramatically improved over the past few decades. It’s pretty rare that a wine is sold that has flaws that would merit a very low score. The median score on Wine Spectator's 100-point scale has certainly risen over the years.

The fact is that we actually do score and publish wines that fall below 80 points. There aren't very many—I counted less than 100 in the past year’s worth of tasting (representing nearly 16,000 wines reviewed). Part of this result is our selection process and our focus. We know we can’t taste every single wine on the market, so we concentrate on blind-tasting the wines we think we can recommend. We pick wines with good track records, reputations, or that have a combination of other factors that make it a good bet for something we think you’d like to drink. While it might be entertaining to read a bad review, we are certain our readers are looking to us for buying advice more than wine fails.

When bad reviews happen, we don’t pull our punches, but we proceed carefully. Any wines that score under 80 points (including wines we suspect are flawed) are automatically marked for retaste. If the second bottle in a second blind tasting shows consistently, we will publish the score, but the score might only appear in our online Wine Ratings Search. The magazine has limited space for reviews, so we typically reserve it for wines we are excited about. We might use the “tasted twice with consistent notes” phrase to let you know when a wine performs inconsistently with its track record.

If the second bottle shows inconsistently, we might ask for or purchase a third bottle. We make the effort to make sure the wines we are reviewing are representative of the production at large.

—Dr. Vinny

Dining Out Sommelier Service Ask Dr. Vinny

More In Dr. Vinny

Is it true that you can clean a red wine stain with white wine? What's the best way to clean a wine stain?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny offers some tried and true methods and advice for …

Jun 17, 2019

How long will an unopened bottle of Champagne stay good?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny explains how sparkling wine ages.

Jun 14, 2019

Are sulfites added to wines for shipping?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny explains where sulfites come from, and why wines often …

Jun 12, 2019

When is the best time to drink Port?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny explains which types of Ports are best served after a …

Jun 10, 2019

Is a 93-point wine from a good vintage the same quality as a 93-point wine from a poor vintage?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny explains how vintage is and is not considered when rating …

Jun 7, 2019

What is a wine’s "style"?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny explains the broad styles, or types, of wine, and what it …

Jun 5, 2019
WineRatings+

WineRatings+

Xvalues

Xvalues

Restaurant Search

Restaurant Search