Don't reviewers recognize cult wines even when they taste them blind?

Ask Dr Vinny

Hello there! I'm Dr. Vinifera, but you can call me Vinny. Ask me your toughest wine questions, from the fine points of etiquette to the science of winemaking. And don't worry, I'm no wine snob—you can also ask me those "dumb questions" you're too embarrased to ask your wine geek friends! I hope you find my answers educational, empowering and even amusing. And don't forget to check out my most asked questions and my full archives for all my Q&A classics.

Dear Dr. Vinny,

When different publications rate different wines differently, it is often explained by blind tasting. When wine experts taste the cult wines, I would think that they are relatively easily identifiable, at least the region. Doesn’t that mean they will have a perception of which wine they are tasting before they score or formulate notes? Is it then more objective?

—Terje D., Norway

Dear Terje,

At Wine Spectator, we do what is called a single-blind tasting, in which the reviewer knows the varietal, vintage and appellation of each wine, but all the bottles are bagged so that the producers and prices are not revealed. (Here’s more about how we taste.) That’s because we believe the best wines reflect where they’re from and what they’re made of. We also believe that every wine should have an equal chance at a high score, no matter how much it costs or who made it, and that this method is both fair and objective.

So, in the scenario you’ve described, we don’t make our tasters guess what region they’re tasting. A so-called “cult” Napa Cabernet is tasted among its peers in a flight of other Napa Cabernets.

But I understand what you’re asking. Do “cult” wines stand out in a blind tasting? Sometimes they do, just as any other good or distinctive wine can stick out among its peers. But the thing about blind tasting is that the taster isn’t distracted by an expectation of a cult wine tasting better, or wondering if the more expensive wine is going to earn a higher score. The taster just describes and evaluates the wine simply by what’s in the glass. In non-blind tastings, it’s easier to give a wine the kind of score that you expect it would get, and to prefer the more expensive bottling to the less expensive one.

—Dr. Vinny

Blind Tasting How to Taste Red Wines United States California Napa Cabernet Sauvignon Ask Dr. Vinny

More In Dr. Vinny

What does it mean to say a wine is “dry”? And which wines are driest?

Wine Spectator's resident wine expert, Dr. Vinny, explains a commonly misunderstood wine …

Jun 21, 2021

Is it OK for a guest to take back a bottle of wine they brought to a dinner party if the host didn't open it?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny offers etiquette advice for bringing wine to a dinner …

Jun 14, 2021

How do wineries pick the glass color for their wine bottles?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny why some wine bottles are tinted green or amber, while …

Jun 7, 2021

When and how does "palate fatigue" kick in at a wine tasting?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny explains the term "palate fatigue," and what happens to …

May 31, 2021

Does appellation-specific wine have to be labeled with a vintage?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny gets an assist from the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade …

May 24, 2021

Do vacuum pumps work for saving leftover wine?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny explains why not all wine-preservation methods are equal.

May 17, 2021