
Although there is no denying that one of the most delicious elements of fine wine is the pleasure of disputing someone else's opinion, sometimes it seems that this can get out of hand. Put simply: Is there anything that we can agree on?
In the interests of what might be called "wine comity," I would like to take a stab at some possible categories that perhaps we can all agree upon. Of course, I have no illusions that any such thing will be accomplished. But, what the hell, it's worth a try. For example:
Malbec from Argentina. I admit that this is a category open to other nominations that are equally as legitimate as Argentina's Malbec. Nevertheless, among all of the many deals available today—Loire Valley wines, various reds from southern Italy and an uncountable number of wines from Spain—I'm prepared to hold firm about Argentine Malbec.
What's it got that makes it such a great deal? Argentina's Malbecs offer a killer combination of genuine originality and an almost absurdly low price. No other wine tastes quite like the best Malbecs from Argentina. This originality is all the more impressive considering that Malbec is not exactly unknown elsewhere, especially in its native France. Yet when it was transplanted to Argentina it became a startlingly new wine life-form. All that for what? Fifteen bucks a bottle?
The screw cap. Now, c'mon, can there really be any question anymore that the screw cap is wine's best friend? When was the last time you poured a bottle of wine down the drain because it had a bad screw cap? With every passing year the evidence continues to mount that screw caps are an almost ideal closure for both red and white wines. Traditionalists continue to both yearn and plump for corks. Believe me, I understand. Yet the fact remains—and it is a fact—that screw caps are the more reliable closure.
Syrah. Timing is everything, they say, and it was California Syrah's bad luck to have come upon the scene in sizable quantities at precisely the same time that California Pinot Noir saw its own surge. We all know what happened: California Pinot Noir became the new darling, and Syrah was thrust into an undeserved shadow. Regrettably, it remains there.
Yet the quality of California Syrah is nothing less than remarkable. This is proved by the fact—well, it's my opinion, anyway—that you can drink amazingly good Syrah at every price level, from the bargain-basement likes of Cycles Gladiator to the finest Syrah accomplishments of top producers such as Alban, Lagier-Meredith and Peay, among many others. I simply cannot believe that this level of quality can go unappreciated and unrecognized indefinitely. Right now, though, Syrah is California's most underrated red wine.
Moscato d'Asti. Do you remember tasting wine for the first time? For most folks it's not a terribly pleasant experience. Over the years I've discovered that if you want to bring someone around to the pleasure of wine, your best choice is something slightly sweet and you-can't-miss-it fragrant.
One contender for this prize is surely Riesling. That acknowledged, I have to say that my own experience shows Moscato d'Asti as the hands-down winner. I have yet to meet a person—be they novice or expert–who is not drawn to the siren scent and seductive fruitiness of the white Muscat grape. It's really unbeatable.
Your best bet is Champagne. This is a category best left to those with ample experience. But it appears that no wine provides greater opportunities in this rather sensitive effort. First, it offers an undeniable glamour. Second, there is a proven physiological effect, best captured in the song title "You Go to My Head."
In 2001, researchers at the University of Surrey at Guildford tested whether bubbles in wine helped to put their guests under the influence. Six of the 12 drinkers tested were each given two glasses of fizzy Champagne, while the other six had the same wine stirred with a whisk to get rid of the bubbles. A week later the test was repeated, with each guest receiving the other type of drink. Test subjects were weighed beforehand so that the amount of Champagne poured into their glass could be adjusted according to their body mass.
The results? Those who drank fizzy Champagne were more intoxicated by nearly every indicator, including blood alcohol levels.
Of course, you could achieve similar results with, say, Port. But how much of that can anyone drink? A bottle of good Champagne, however, is gone in a flash.
Tuscany. Here again, there are surely other serious contenders for this questionable distinction. Who, after all, can understand, say, Sonoma County?
Nevertheless, I believe that the single most confusing, difficult-to-grasp, almost-impossible-to-predict-what-you-have-in-the-bottle zone in the world is Tuscany. You can't know, for example, which grape variety or varieties your wine is composed of. You can't predict whether there will be a little or a lot of oak. Really, you have no idea what a name like "Chianti" really signifies.
And what makes this so maddening is that you can get anything from one of the most spectacularly fine red wines you can drink to an innocuous blend of no distinction whatever. Tuscany at its best is thrilling. But it's also hugely frustrating—and exceedingly difficult to understand.
Bordeaux. It's ironic that Bordeaux is so easy to understand, if only because it shouldn't be. After all, Bordeaux cranks out an immense amount of wine. It has tens of thousands of producers. Yet when you think about it, Bordeaux is surprisingly easy to grasp. At the high end, the French have given us a handy little crib sheet in the form of the classed-growths.
At the low end you have a variety of district names and, typically, just one or two wines (almost always blends) from each château. Given the vast array of wine produced, Bordeaux is impressively easy to comprehend.
Auxey-Duresses. The idea of a "deal" in Burgundy is always a questionable notion. Nevertheless, if you're looking for some of the best wines produced in Burgundy at the (relatively) lowest prices, your best bet is Auxey-Duresses. This, by the way, applies to both red (Pinot Noir) and white (Chardonnay).
The wines of Auxey-Duresses are known for a distinctive earthiness. They are also quite long-lived; most of the best reds and whites from a good vintage come into their own after a decade's worth of aging.
One other feature makes Auxey-Duresses a deal: The district collectively boasts some of the oldest vines in Burgundy. Consequently, yields can be lower than elsewhere. Auxey-Duresses has long been the go-to village for négociants looking for inexpensive high-quality Pinot Noir and Chardonnay to beef up their blends.
Spain. It's amazing how difficult it is to obtain really interesting dry white wine that doesn't cost a fortune. These days, if you say "Chardonnay," the odds of getting anything interesting are slim indeed.
This is all the more reason why I pronounce Spain to be the source of today's best white wine deals. Simply put, Spain now offers a greater variety of truly distinctive white wines that sell for what can only be called reasonable prices than any other country. (France is surely a contender in this category as well, but too many French white wines are increasingly expensive.)
When you think about the fascinating Spanish whites from zones such as Rías Baixas, Rueda, Txakoli, Penedès and Rioja—and let's not forget Sherry (Jerez)—as well as truly intriguing grape varieties such as Godello, Spain is a serious contender. When you factor in the reasonable prices, I’d say that Spain clearly offers today's best deals in really good dry white wine.
So there you have it. Of course I expect you to agree with all of my conclusions (yeah, right). Still, it's food—or rather, wine—for thought, and I look forward to reading your nominations, as well as your thoughts on why, inevitably, I am wrong in my own.
Brian Seel — Naperville, IL — December 6, 2011 1:57pm ET
Vince Liotta — Elmhurst Illinois — December 6, 2011 3:58pm ET
Matt, You're so provocative. Your promoting categories we can "agree" on, and then you begin with a category--the "best deal"--about which most will almost certainly have differing opinions. Many don't even like full bodied reds. Moreover, this is a category which even last to know anything retailers like myself have been promoting for years. Hardly, a new idea.
Tom
Dejan Bajic — Belgrade, Serbia, Europe — December 6, 2011 4:16pm ET
Hi Matt, great stuff. Again!
I agree about Malbecs and those for 15 are great but I have some "premium" bottles like Zapata's Nicasia vinyards and Achaval Ferrer's Finca Altamira and these are true rapsody in bottle and for little more money but worth every cent.....
Ed Lehrman — Sausalito, CA USA — December 6, 2011 7:06pm ET
I couldn't agree more with your choice of Malbec as the "Best Deal in Fine Wine". We've been saying it for over a decade, andit is great to see its widespread acceptance. Now about Torrontes as the finest white wine value... :-)
Ed Lehrman
Vine Connections
Authentically Argentine
Giancarlo Ortega — Washington DC — December 6, 2011 8:55pm ET
Personally, i find Burgundy much more confusing than Tuscany, of course not on varietal composition, but rather in terms of quality which is all over the place and in the distinct number of labels.
Peter Shanahan — burlington, ontario — December 6, 2011 11:09pm ET
Best deal in fine wine today: two other contenders
1) Riesling- German,Canadian, French and Australian
2) Port- tawny, LBV and vintage, deals at all levels
John Kafarski — Highland Park, New Jersey — December 7, 2011 8:21am ET
Matt,
I always look forward to you sneaking in a bit on West Coast Syrah. It is indeed perhaps the most underrated category in the New World. 05's from CA are showing might well right now. The good news is prices are still down as demand isn't very high. The bad news, many people might not get a chance to try these wines as they are scooped by those who see a bargain when they see one.
Stephen Stewart — new mexico — December 7, 2011 10:14am ET
For me, the wines of the loire are the best deals at the moment.Especially the reds.I do enjoy Malbec though.A great wine to drink without food!
Susan Aventi — Las Vegas NV — December 7, 2011 11:27am ET
I love the way you present great topics in fun ways. Question for you about screw caps. (I like the convenience. I don't equate the pop sound of removing a cork with "romance.") The main grievance I've heard about screw caps is this reduction phenomenon. I’m all too familiar with TCA/cork taint – but I’m not sure I’ve ever experienced “reduction” from a bottle sealed with a screw cap. Any thoughts?
Matt Kramer — Portland, OR — December 7, 2011 6:07pm ET
Ms. Aventi. Thank you for your kind words. You ask: "The main grievance I've heard about screw caps is this reduction phenomenon. I’m all too familiar with TCA/cork taint – but I’m not sure I’ve ever experienced “reduction” from a bottle sealed with a screw cap."
The issue of reduction and screw caps is--wait for it--a complicated matter. It's complicated because "reduction" isn't a simple thing and a fair amount of wine chemistry is involved. And I should point out from the outset that I'm hardly the most qualified person to explicate this. That said, here's my understanding based upon discussions with winemakers and from what I've read.
Simply put, reduction involves a wine's interaction (or lack of it) with oxygen. This occurs in the winery, most typically by storing wines in wood barrels. But it also occurs, in more minuscule but still detectable, amounts in bottle, depending upon the closure.
Corks allow more oxygen to reach a finished wine than screw caps. Indeed, wineries can now choose from screw cap liners with different oxygen transmission levels. If you look inside the screw cap you will see either a silver-colored liner or a white liner. The silver color liner is a twin layer of tin and a plastic barrier film brand-named Saranex. (Yup, it's the same stuff as Saran wrap: polyvinylidene chloride). It allows very little oxygen transmission. The white liner is only Saranex and it allows a little more oxygen transmission.
Here's the key point: screw caps admit less oxygen than natural corks. (Synthetic corks admit more oxygen than either corks or screw caps, by the way. And synthetics lose their seal in a mere few years.)
With natural cork, the wine had, if you will, a bit of a "back up" available after bottling. Not a lot, mind you, but some additional oxygen was available to the finished, bottled wine over time.
But screw caps are, you might say, a "Las Vegas story": What you put in the bottle, stays in the bottle.
So if a wine--especially a red wine--didn't get as much oxygen as it needs during the cellaring process from a sufficient number of "rackings" which exposes the wine to air, then when it goes into a screw-capped bottle, there's no further chance of additional amelioration.
What this means is that if winemakers know that their wine will be sealed in a screw-capped bottle, they must be vigilant in insuring that the wine retains no "reductive" properties that can--and very likely will--become magnified over time with such an airtight closure. Typically, these are volatile sulfur compounds such as mercaptans, which creates such smells as cabbage, rubber and burnt rubber, among other disagreeable descriptors.
The bottom line is this: Traditional wine cellaring practices that served for centuries with a cork-finished bottle likely need to be modified for wines destined for a bottle sealed with a screw cap.
Such cellaring changes are now in practice. But every wine is different. Different grape varieties are more or less susceptible to "reduction"--which is another way of saying that they need more or less oxygen. Syrah, for example, is notoriously "reductive", needing more frequent rackings; Pinot Noir, in comparison, is more sensitive to oxygen uptake.
Anyway, I hope this helps. And if any winemakers or chemists reading this explanation care to offer further amplification (or correction), I warmly invite you to do so. As I said, this is technical stuff with a lot of fine, but important, nuances.
Matthew Johnson — Sacramento, CA — December 7, 2011 7:19pm ET
Great column. I don't even want to argue with you about any of those selections. I started laughing when you picked Moscato d'Asti - I was thinking the same thing. I have recommended it to many new wine drinkers and they LOVE it. I still love it. Sometimes you just want a sweet and fruity refreshment. Lambrusco works but the fragrance of Moscato d'Asti always seals the deal.
Susan Aventi — Las Vegas NV — December 9, 2011 10:23am ET
Matt, Thanks for the best explanation I could have hoped for! I'll be on alert for those mercaptan signals.
Dennis D Bishop — Shelby Twp., MI, USA — December 10, 2011 11:06am ET
I agree with most of what you say. I agree most with Champagne's seductive qualities and least with Bordeaux as the easiest region to understand. In my opinion, Columbia Valley is the easiest. However, it is just starting to move towards a little more complexity.
Want to join or start a discussion? Become a WineSpectator.com member and you can!
To protect the quality of our conversations, only members may submit comments. To learn more about member benefits, take our site tour.
Sips & Tips | Wine & Healthy Living
Video Theater | Collecting & Auctions
» View samples
» Or sign up now!
» Manage my newsletter preferences

The marketplace for all your wine needs, including:
Wine Storage | Wine Clubs
Dining & Travel | Wine Auctions
Wine Shops | Wine Accessories
I think Vouvray is a better way to introduce someone to wine than Moscato. With Moscato eventually they will learn it is a dessert wine and they might deduce from that they don't really like wine. But Vouvray hits on the criteria you mentioned and is a more mainstream wine.
You nailed it with Tuscany.