
A disturbing report from the international organization Human Rights Watch has accused South Africa's fruit farms and grapegrowers of subjecting their agricultural workers to inhuman conditions. But members of the wine industry are calling the report a smear job, pointing out that the organization investigated less than 1 percent of the nation's grape farms. They're fighting back against what they say is an attempt to hurt export sales.
Human Rights Watch (HRW), an international nongovernmental organization that monitors rights issues, released the report in late August. Staff members interviewed fruit and grape farm workers, farmers, labor organizers and charity workers in the Western Cape region, the heart of the country's wine industry. The report details workers living in dilapidated housing. One 40-year-old farm worker said he and his family had been living in a pig stall for 10 years. Others said farmers forcibly evicted them. "The wealth and well-being these workers produce should not be rooted in human misery," said Daniel Bekele, director of HRW Africa. "The government and the industries and farmers themselves need to do a lot more to protect people who live and work on farms."
The report also said workers were made to spray pesticides without proper safety equipment, that they had little access to toilets or drinking water while working and that farm owners prevented unionization. "Despite their critical role in the success of the country’s valuable fruit, wine and tourism industries, farm workers benefit very little, in large part because they are subject to exploitative conditions and human rights abuses without sufficient protection of their rights," the report states.
Almost 17 years after apartheid's end, the issue of agricultural workers' rights is still a sensitive one in South Africa. Most farms and wineries are still owned by whites while almost all farm laborers are black. Poverty is a serious issue, and farm labor continues to be one of the lowest paid professions. And the wine industry has had to make a dramatic transition from large farms that sold 70 percent of grapes to brandy distillers to smaller, more quality-focused producers.
Winery owners told Wine Spectator that they don't doubt there are isolated horrible examples of farm owners mistreating workers. But what upsets them is the HRW's blanket accusation against the entire industry. "The Cape wine community has been shocked by the report," said Su Birch, CEO of Wines of South Africa, a trade group. "On the one hand, shocked by the conditions exposed, but on the other, shocked by the one-sided, selective sampling and reporting."
HRW 's report is based on interviews in 2010 and 2011 with over 260 people, including 117 farm workers. The report covered about 60 farms, 21 of which were visited by HRW researchers. "Most of the farms produce fruit; approximately one-third are wine farms or wine and fruit farms," the text states. There are approximately 4,000 grape farms in South Africa, which means HRW visited about 0.5 percent. None of the farms were identified, the report says, to protect workers from possible retaliation.
“Readers of the report have no basis for understanding how representative the sample of respondents is," said Birch. "Moreover, the media release, provocatively entitled South Africa: Farmworkers’ Dismal, Dangerous Lives and distributed internationally to announce the report, does not present a sufficiently comprehensive picture of conditions across the wine industry and, as a result, is potentially misleading."
Media outlets in several countries quickly picked up the report, especially in the U.K., which is South Africa's biggest export market for wine. A spokesman for HRW told one U.K. newspaper that customers should push retailers to question where their South African wine comes from. "Globally conditions are tough," said Birch. "This kind of reporting deters importers or retailers from listing South Africa."
Some winemakers are also complaining that the report ignores industry efforts to improve worker conditions and monitor conditions at farms. According to Birch, grapegrowers currently provide housing for 200,000 workers. Winery owners have been working with the Wine Industry Ethical Trade Association (WIETA) to ensure workers are treated fairly. Wineries who buy grapes often insist growers include WIETA worker standards in contracts. The industry has also partnered with Fairtrade to make sure exports come from responsible wineries.
The Western Cape provincial government has asked HRW to name the farms involved so it can take action, but the organization has refused. The government is now threatening possible legal action, accusing the organization of defamation.
David Sean Muttillo — Port — September 27, 2011 3:09pm ET
Byron Marshall — Maine — September 28, 2011 7:42am ET
well, when you consider how often a handful of observed human rights abuses are situated within a much vaster culture of exploitation, i can understand how HRW might let their extrapolations run a bit wild. i mean, would anyone be surprised if the generalization panned out? it would be far more surprising to me, as someone who's traveled a bit in SA, to learn that the majority of field workers are living in anything other than first-degree squalor.
David Sean Muttillo — Port — September 28, 2011 2:45pm ET
Having travelled in South Africa, as well, I am certain it varies from place to place how people are treated and housed. Much like it does here in the USA for our migrant workers. When I was at Fairview winery they had nice housing for the field workers and places for the children to play - including a playground that would please any American family. Of the numerous wineries I visited there I saw no employees disheveled or living in squalor.
(The HRW report was also covering the fruit industry as a whole, and simply mixed wine farms in with everything else. I can't answer for how other parts of the industry treat their people and won't pretend to.
In seems to me that lumping everything together and passing judgment on the whole is terribly inappropriate. It would be like lumping the retail grocery industry together and asserting that Whole Foods and Walmart treat their employees the same way).
Driving down the highways of the western Cape, was another matter altogether. The shanty towns/impromptu settlements were all over the place. Even there it was clear that the government of South Africa was at least trying to help.
All that being said, for HRW to let their imaginations run wild in an internationally marketed and published report, offering almost exclusively negative coverage of working conditions is both libellous and deframatory. Especially when there are clear and obvious counter examples that they generally ignored. To say there aren't still some bad seed Afrikaaners out in the industry would be stupid. But, to paint everyone with the same basic brush stroke is dishonest. It was quite clear from reading the report that HRW had an agenda, and they were not going to let any counterveiling facts get in the way.
Want to join or start a discussion? Become a WineSpectator.com member and you can!
To protect the quality of our conversations, only members may submit comments. To learn more about member benefits, take our site tour.
Sips & Tips | Wine & Healthy Living
Video Theater | Collecting & Auctions
» View samples
» Or sign up now!
» Manage my newsletter preferences

The marketplace for all your wine needs, including:
Wine Storage | Wine Clubs
Dining & Travel | Wine Auctions
Wine Shops | Wine Accessories
A careful reading of the HRW report from end to end reveals a number things: One, HRW consistently uses inflammatory language throughout the report to the point that the report demonstrates a serious lack of professionalism and journalistic integrity.
Second, the methodology of the HRW report is so seriously flawed that it again fails to make itself credible from a research perspective. Out of 121,000 agricultural workers in the Western Cape only 85 active workers were interviewed for the report, if you add retirees the number interviewed only jumps to 117 out of 121,000 ... less than 1/100th of 1%. Of the over 4,000 winefarms in the western Cape only about 7 were actually visited. For a total of .00175% of the western Cape's winefarms physically being visited for this report. It is a serious flaw indeed to extrapolate .00175% of the western Cape's winefarms into such an indictment of the South African wine industry. (See pp 22-23 of the report).
Third, reading through the body of the report itself we find HRW condemning the South African fruit industry for not providing better workers rights than much of what we have in the US. The report is written from a utopian point of view demanding uber first world rights in a developing (read 3rd world if you like) nation. This too is unreasonable. HRW denegrates South Africa, its farmers and government for not providing better and greater working rights than my wife and I enjoy here in the USA.
While this report clearly uncovers some egregious violations of human dignity by a tiny number of farmers, it's sample size is far too small to be reliable and its utopian expectations in a third world country make it unreasonable. Sadly, this report is of little practical value to anyone due to its thoroughly flawed, unreasonable and inflammatory nature. HRW examined a polluted tide pool and extrapolated to conclusions about an entire ocean.