
It may be impossible to crown a “best vintage ever” in Bordeaux, but it is easy to name the priciest Bordeaux futures campaign ever, and we’re in it.
The futures, or en primeur, campaign for the 2010 vintage began weeks later than usual, with few classified growths and top labels releasing their prices until this week. And with their cards showing, it is clear they are playing a high-stakes game: Of 15 leading châteaus who have released their prices that Wine Spectator is tracking (see chart below), all have maintained or raised their prices from their 2009 releases, some as much as 122 percent higher at retail in the United States. Last year’s prices were already unprecedented, and this year, the dollar is weak against the euro.
“I’ve been surprised,” said Chris Adams, CEO of Sherry-Lehmann Wines in New York. “If that’s the way the demand structure for Bordeaux is going internationally, then all the better for them; I’m a capitalist. But I didn’t think the overall global market would support these kinds of increases, and we’ll see if it will.”
Some retailers have been more blunt. “As a whole, the prices are pretty absurd," said Daniel Posner, of Grapes, The Wine Company, in White Plains, N.Y. "There hasn’t been a wine out there where I’m like, ‘Oh, thank goodness someone had their head on straight when they released that price.’”
The annual Bordeaux futures campaign allows buyers to snap up young wines still aging in château cellars. Approximately two years later, the bottled wines are delivered. (For James Molesworth's reviews of the new wines, see his 2010 Bordeaux barrel tasting report.)
If conducted wisely, en primeur can benefit producers and consumers alike: Châteaus can sell off much of their wine quickly, while consumers often get access to lower prices and higher quantities than they would when the wines are released. But overpricing, especially in an uninspiring vintage, can ruin the investment. Those who bought the 1997 vintage en primeur saw the same wines appear on retail shelves for cheaper the next year. Most premium labels from the 2007 vintage can be had for the same price or less today than they sold at as futures.
Pontet-Canet owner Alfred Tesseron hopes he does not price out his loyal buyers. “I am afraid that it could happen, but this is true for all the great wines of the world.”
The 2010 vintage is excellent, but so was 2009, which had been eagerly anticipated after three underwhelming vintages. Christian Seely, managing director of AXA Millésimes, which owns Château Pichon-Longueville-Baron and three other Bordeaux properties, described the challenge in marketing this year. “It’s a different thing when you say, ‘Here’s a great year, well … like last year, really.’”
Some American retailers are feeling vintage hype fatigue. “Sales have been much slower than [those of] the '09s,” said Trey Beffa, of K&L Wine Merchants in Los Angeles. “There seems to be a lot less interest than there was last year.” Consumers have not even received their bottled 2009 wines yet, which Beffa said many of his customers purchased briskly. “They already have a lot of stuff lingering out there, waiting to be shipped.”
At Sherry-Lehmann, Adams only took 70 percent of the allocations he had last year. Some longtime collectors simply do not have the means to follow their favorite brands. “The guy who was buying Smith-Haut-Lafitte at $30 a bottle less than a decade ago is certainly not buying the wine at $150 today,” said Posner. “The person that even last year bought La Fleur-Pétrus at $140 a bottle, I don’t know if they’re spending $300 today. I have a child born in 2010, and I can’t see myself putting any Bordeaux away for him because there’s just nothing I can afford.”
“That’s the problem with dealing with something that’s become a commodity,” Posner said. “You lose a lot of the passion and you gain a lot of the money.”
In Bordeaux, Château Pontet-Canet owner Alfred Tesseron hopes he does not price out his loyal buyers, but concedes the market is moving up. “I am afraid that it could happen, but this is true for all the great wines of the world.”
If Americans are holding back on Bordeaux, they're the exception. “There seems to be consistent demand across many different markets. It’s not just the U.K. or Asia,” said Mathieu Chadronnier, general manager of CVGB, a leading négociant. "We’re having a pretty strong campaign in more traditional European markets—Switzerland, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands. The only market where demand is really shy is the U.S.” Only the Japanese market, still recovering from March's devastating earthquake and tsunami, is as flat.
“I think that what you really need to look at in the end is the figures," said Seely, "and the figures show that there’s a lot of wine being sold on a global basis.” Pichon-Baron debuted Wednesday at $226 in U.S. stores, a 70 percent increase over 2009. Château Montrose released its first tranche, its initial limited offering, Wednesday morning in Bordeaux. By afternoon, that tranche was sold out, replaced by a second at a higher price. Pontet-Canet burned through its first tranche in half an hour, according to Tesseron.
“I’m not sure [the Bordelais] are super concerned if the Americans are going to buy this year.”—Trey Beffa, retailer
Analysts have kept a close eye on the impact of new markets, especially mainland China. Chadronnier, who sells to China, confirmed that there was growth in that market, which traditionally passes on en primeur. But “the growth we’re seeing is softer than what we saw in back vintages,” he said. The real growth this year has been in breadth of wine rather than bulk. “The demand in China is still geared toward grands crus classés. But we’re talking about roughly 60 châteaus,” instead of 10. “It’s also expanding on the Right Bank. The range of fine Bordeaux that are consistently distributed in China is really expanding.”
All of which diminishes America's importance to château owners. “I’m not sure [the Bordelais] are super concerned if the Americans are going to buy this year,” said Beffa.
But success is far from guaranteed, and Bordeaux may still regret its pricing. “This year there was a lot of nervousness in the markets,” said Jean-Charles Cazes of Château Lynch-Bages, which was released Wednesday at $175 at retail, over $115 in 2009. That nervousness created a late start. “People didn’t know what to do so they waited and waited and waited for a signal, for a wine to come out. Now Vinexpo [the trade fair] is ahead of us, so lots of producers are now getting worried about releasing after Vinexpo and maybe missing the train, and there’s not as much demand as last year. There will be blood on the wall.”
In the long run, the wines will sell. Chadronnier sees the vintage, on the whole, as immune to depreciation, in part because lower yields in 2010 will keep demand up. “Some vintages go up faster in value than others, so we’ll see how it performs there, but I don’t see it really losing value.”
Though the first-growths are likely to be out of reach for many wine lovers, improved quality means there are options at less stratospheric prices. Shoppers just need to do their homework. The consensus in the industry seems to be that Pontet-Canet, Lynch-Bages and Léoville Poyferré are three producers with high-quality 2010s that, while a splurge, will set buyers back less than $200 a bottle—if they hurry.
Cazes said Lynch Bages sales in the first day were brisk, even though his grand vin is priced 52 percent over its 2009 price at retail. “If you look at the price of the 2009, it’s now trading on the Bordeaux open market at almost twice the price of the release and with significant volume,” he said, explaining that he set his new price 15 percent below the current real 2009 price, 30 percent below 2005 and 50 percent below 2000. Tesseron also said his 2010, at $177 retail, is “substantially cheaper” than 2009 and 2005 today.
Retailers who spoke with Wine Spectator also suggested that Gruaud-Larose, Chasse-Spleen, Poujeaux, Angludet, La Lagune, Branaire Ducru, d’Issan and La Tour Carnet will deliver per dollar. “If you look at the breadth of what Bordeaux has to offer, in spite of the high prices of the small number of headline châteaus, there’s an awful lot of seriously good value out there, especially in 2010,” said Seely, whose lower-priced Château Pibran in Pauillac enjoys the same technical expertise applied at nearby Pichon-Baron.
Other under-the-radar properties appeal at even lower prices. In his coverage of the vintage, James Molesworth has recommended Malartic-Lagravière, Brown, Jean Faux, Dalem and Fleur-Cardinale as values. “Yes, we reduced the price,” said Malartic-Lagravière owner Jean-Jacques Bonnie, and sales have been brisk. “The advice we got was to stop waiting to release the wine and decrease the price, which was what the traditional markets were expecting.”
Even in the American market, there is cautious optimism. “I think that there was value very early in the campaign, which is what I liked so much about the 2010s, that there was depth to the vintage,” said Adams, adding that he expects a younger clientele than usual this year. “It’s been trending that way for the last few years.”
Adams suggested another option for value hunters. “The story for a lot of the bigger names is that their second wines are still accessible,” he said, citing Baron de Brane as one. Echo de Lynch Bages and Les Pagodes des Cos only rose slightly, to $46 and $68, respectively.
Finally, if only by comparison, the 2010 campaign has fired up renewed interest in back vintages. While Bordeaux futures prices could continue to float up and away in the coming years, 2006, 2007 and especially 2008 are all attractively priced and attracting American consumer interest today.
“People say [2008] is the last value vintage,” said Adams. “But there will always be another value vintage down the road.”
Pricing data compiled by Stefanie Schwartz.
| Château | 2005 | 2009 | 2010 | Change, '09 to '10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beychevelle | $49 | $67 | $95 | 42% |
| La Fleur-Pétrus | $103 | $136 | $302 | 122% |
| Gazin | $57 | $76 | $86 | 13% |
| Léoville-Barton | $95 | $95 | $123 | 29% |
| Léoville Poyferré | $91 | $122 | $151 | 24% |
| Lynch-Bages | $81 | $115 | $175 | 52% |
| Montrose | $106 | $179 | $235 | 31% |
| Pape Clément | $152 | $135 | $161 | 19% |
| Pavie-Macquin | $85 | $93 | $126 | 35% |
| Pichon-Baron | $124 | $133 | $226 | 70% |
| Pichon-Lalande | $127 | $186 | $234 | 26% |
| Pontet-Canet | $82 | $132 | $177 | 34% |
| Rauzan-Ségla | $88 | $95 | $130 | 37% |
| Smith-Haut-Lafitte | $66 | $97 | $124 | 28% |
| Sociando-Mallet | $44 | $40 | $41 | 3% |
Chris A Elerick — Orlando, FL — June 17, 2011 1:23pm ET
Darcy Kelley — Toronto, On, CAN — June 17, 2011 1:59pm ET
The Bordelaise are wonderful people, but their wines are not "crack" and I can live rather happily without their wines. I don't know about others but I've moved toward Barolo and Barbaresco in recent years. Yes, those wines have different organoleptic profiles, but they age just as beautifully, can last as long, and have stayed relatively stable in price. I do think the classified growths are entitled to get much as they can for their wines, but I'd have more respect for them if they dropped the pompous airs & graces, and just said they're in it to maximize profits.
Reggie Mcconnell — Indiana — June 17, 2011 2:11pm ET
Let's face it, ultra-premium French wines (first growths and the best burgundies) have become the exclusive province of billionaires. Even a surgeon knocking down a cool million per year cannot afford to both collect and drink La Tâche on a regular basis. The last vintage of La Tâche to be reviewed by this magazine was the 2002. Current asking price: $2200 per bottle. And good luck getting reimbursed for a corked bottle.
Jeffrey Ghi — New York — June 17, 2011 2:12pm ET
Hey, if you can drink only your own punch for the rest of your life, why not charge an insane amount?
They double the price, sell half as much, make the same profit and potentially retain much more for future inventory release. Sounds like there's no loss to the owners.
Unless the new growth markets seriously retrench on purchases, if I were a chateau owner, I'd ride out the profits as long as I can.
Lawrence Newcombe — bay city, mj — June 17, 2011 4:07pm ET
What's next you say ? What else....The gouge from
Napa ! Just close your eyes and listen ...its the Ooohs and Aaahs from so so winemakers on the left coast.
Iain Liston-brown — Lichfield, UK — June 17, 2011 5:02pm ET
For me the crux of market acceptance of Bordeaux pricing is whether the purchase is for drinking or investment.
I can see investers continuing to persue trophy names from classified growths, taking a risk and looking to offload with a potential profit in years to come.
For drinkers then will they stand these increases? Will new consumers come to Boardeaux? Certainly as you get older you debate how much more wine you need to purchase that needs cellaring for 20 years. Add this to 25-40% price increases and the decision becomes easy.
If I am right then Bordeaux across all classified growths need new markets and new drinkers to support their pricing (hello Hong Kong and Shanghai). Somehow I doubt investers can sustain theses price increases for all but the top Chateaux.
The Wine & Cheese Place — St. Louis, MO — June 17, 2011 8:06pm ET
"Bordeaux’s top châteaus may be saying au revoir to American consumers"
No, no, no, no, you have it backwards - USA consumers and retailers are saying goodbye to Bordeaux!
Matt Gross
Ivan Campos — Ottawa, Canada — June 17, 2011 9:49pm ET
"loyal buyers"? funny. I have been with Pontet-Canet for a few vintages now, but their price in Ontario -- with the Canadian dollar stronger than the US dollar -- has jumped from 175 to $240! Are they going to write me a cheque for the difference for being a loyal customer? sounds like they're happier selling their wines to folks who couldn't care less about what the stuff tastes like and more about saying that they serve a classified Bordeauxwith the equivalent of beer nuts. sigh.
Si vous lissez ceci, ecoutez moi: je suis decu.
Miguel S Ostrowski — west palm beach florida — June 17, 2011 11:29pm ET
although I love bordeaux's and they will always be at the top of my list, this insane price increase just turns me more and more to my new love towards the italians, Barolo, barbaresco, brunello's keep adding up to my collection. I understand that the bordelais want to profit, and have nothig against it, but they should be careful with all their new world and old world competitors. Lots of us will just turn away, and if they don't mind... well it's shame for all of us bordeaux lovers and they might just become the mistress that is allowed in the cellar every once in a while.
Louis Robichaux — Highland Village, Texas — June 18, 2011 12:21am ET
Please help me understand this. Are the Far East and AsiaPac buyers honestly hooked on the Bordeaux style and believe the pricing is truly justified, or are they drawn to the status and prestige of classified growth Bordeaux?
And I agree with Mr. Gross!
Lucia Chan — China — June 18, 2011 3:55am ET
Will the DRINKERS (say the Cab lovers) have to take on the Bdx? Plenty of good Cab in Italy and US for less money to pay.
Marchello Chacchia — Connecticut — June 18, 2011 8:16am ET
Give us a B
Give us a U
Give us a B
GIve us a B
Give us an L
Give us an E
What's that spell?
Joseph Dangelo — New Jersey — June 18, 2011 8:59am ET
I LOVE Bordeaux, but ca'mon. With all the quality wine being produced around the world why spend the cash on the 2010 vintage. Look somewhere else..Chile, Argentina, South Africa and of course everywhere else in Europe. You can get great Cabernet/Merlot based wines there for a fraction of the price. So I will be skipping out on Bordeaux and the 2010 gaudy prices and exploring the worlds other great wines, If everyone else does the same I am sure this will be the last time we see these greedy price increases.
Mark Lyon — Sonoma, CA; USA — June 18, 2011 7:53pm ET
Being a California Winemaker who loves Bordeaux; I'm shocked at how much higher the classified growths have inflated! I'm passing on futures for both 09 and 10; opting for the undervalued 08's. Finally, this may move the US consumer to look for unclassified growths (count me in) from the 09 and 10 Vintages. In addition; there is both Washington and Sonoma offering high quality Cabernets at reasonable pricing! Time to explore new territories for Red Bordeaux blends.
Troy Peterson — Burbank, CA — June 18, 2011 11:02pm ET
Oh, I've been priced out of PC for the last couple of campaigns Mr. Tesseron. As good as your wines are vis-a-vis First Growths, I've simply found more immediate pleasure and at the same price point from domestic wines. At least I still have my PC vertical in waiting, and waiting, and waiting....
Karl Mark — Geneva, IL. — June 19, 2011 8:03am ET
I do think one of the reasons that Americans are balking at the high BDX prices is due to the high availability of quality wines from other regions. Very little Cali and Washington wines are exported to England or europe, so consumers over there are without options. Personally if I lived in Australia I would be planting Cabernet and taking advantage of the situation world.
William Murray — Buffalo, NY / London, UK — June 19, 2011 2:37pm ET
I think one thing people need to consider is even though the volumes are massive in Bordeaux compared to the cults in CA, Pontet-Canet, for example, produces "only" ~20,000 cases a year. in 1995, Pontet-Canet produced 23,000, so production has not increased in 15+ years. When you purchase Bordeaux futures, you almost certainly buy a case or at least a 6xbt case per name. That means, for any given year, only 20,000 people can buy a case of Pontet-Canet, particularly relevant in a strong year such as 2009 or 2010.
To put 20,000 cases in context, in 2008, the US Wine Market Council's survey showed there were 75mm wine drinkers in America, with over 50% of them drinking at least a bottle a week (ie regular drinkers). If just 1% of the regular drinkers favored claret and wanted to buy outstanding quality wine at a (relatively) affordable price compared to the first growths, that would mean 350,000 Americans would be looking for a case of bottlings such as Pontet-Canet, Lynch Bages, and the others. And that's just in America alone, not including the UK, France, and emerging Asia.
Unfortunately, at 29 years old im too young to remember the good-ol-days where you could buy Lafite for $50/bottle, and I, just like everyone else, would *love* to be able to purchase my bottles at a cheaper price to allow me to either step up in quality or buy more from different produces each year within my budget. That said, given the economics of the amount of people globally buying fine wine, and the fact that unlike the US and emerging wine producing countries, production in the premier sites on the left and right banks will not increase in my lifetime, my thinking is I better allocate my claret for my golden years before its too late.
Stephen Kahn Law Offc — Los Angeles, Cal USA — June 19, 2011 6:47pm ET
I think the answer is simple. There is to much great wine from other sources to even bother with the young classified wines from Bordeaux. I say look to California, Washington and Oregon. Look to Chili, and Argentina. Look to Australia. You will find a world of great wine. Not one of us real wine "drinkers" will go without excellent wine to drink and enjoy. Let bordeaux enjoy its bubble. We will be enjoying our other wines and will smile when their crash comes.
Matthew Lo — Zurich, Switzerland — June 20, 2011 4:40am ET
I have been buying Pontet-Canet since 1995 vintage. It was quite reasonable back then. Every year I see the price goes up and up. My last vintage was 2004. I remembered that I bought 2002 for around 40 USD. Those days are gone. So much to be "loyal follower". I even think the price will be the same level in so-so vintage. Time to spend money on other upcoming names. A lot of homework needed to be done. The worst thing is you would not know if you bet correctly until at least 10 years later. In addition, I have bought Bordeaux in every vintage for the last 10 years. It is hard to accept a gap in the vintage!
We do not have much Cali cab over here. The ones are here are not that reasonably priced either. The major thing about new world wine in Switzerland or even Europe is that we do not get small and interesting producers. In my opinion, it is hard for me to switch sides. I do find myself buying a lot more Italian wine in the last few years.
Leonard & Terry Korn — Cathedral City, California, USA — June 21, 2011 8:01am ET
For my husband and I, being on a very fixed income that doesn't allow us to partake in this madness, there is a very bright side to great Bordeaux vintages. Great vintages produce really good wine at the lower end of the price scale. We currently have several bottles of 2005 Chateau Puygueraud in our cabinet. Rated a 92 by WS and bought for $18 a bottle. And I'm betting there's going to be a lot '09 and '10 Bordeaux similarly rated for reasonable prices, and those are what I'm going to go after. Do they have the cachet of Pontet-Canet - no. But they'll represent the vintage with honor, age gracefully, and I'll be able to buy a case for the price of one bottle of Pontet-Canet.
Our son and his daughter just presented us with our first grandchildren, twins! For his first Father's Day, we gave him our one bottle of 2000 Lynch-Bages. It was a worthy exchange.
Terry Korn
Christine Humphrey — Los Angeles — June 21, 2011 10:33am ET
I will always love and buy some Bordeaux and Burgundy wines, but have discovered other French regions, such as Languedoc, the Rhone and Loire that have some beautiful and reasonably priced wines. I brought back a bottle of Marc Bredif Reserve Chinon last fall from Loire at a cost of about $27 USD and drank it a few weeks ago.
I will always buy French wines. I just like their structure. I am discovering, learning and enjoying fine Italian wines. There
are great wines to be had from all the world's wine regions, although I have not had much luck with South American or
South African wines.
But, here in California, I am finding more of our wines made in the Old World style, with European vintners influencing and owning more interests in American wineries. And, for me, that's a good thing.
John Reeves — USA — June 22, 2011 6:30pm ET
comparing 1 year quotes between FXE and UUP, there is about a 32% relative drop between the 2.
Just the rise in FXE over the year, looks like about 18%, may account for much of the price increases, if that matters.
One can hope the currency performance gap will close, and be reflected in bordeaux prices in the US distribution, eh?
Joann Degaglia — new york — June 22, 2011 8:41pm ET
Wine is fashion. What some buy now at a premium others will buy on WTSO. It's all relative.
Want to join or start a discussion? Become a WineSpectator.com member and you can!
To protect the quality of our conversations, only members may submit comments. To learn more about member benefits, take our site tour.
Sips & Tips | Wine & Healthy Living
Video Theater | Collecting & Auctions
» View samples
» Or sign up now!
» Manage my newsletter preferences

The marketplace for all your wine needs, including:
Wine Storage | Wine Clubs
Dining & Travel | Wine Auctions
Wine Shops | Wine Accessories
i was pretty shocked at la fleur-petrus and the pichons. and to your question, i do think they're pricing themselves out of the american market as well as the european market.