
A French judge has ruled in the case of the faux Red Bicyclette. A court in Carcassonne handed out suspended jail terms and fines on Wednesday to 12 members of the Languedoc wine industry for selling millions of bottles of Pinot Noir to Gallo for its Red Bicyclette label that were illegally cut with cheaper Merlot and Syrah.
The defendants, including figures from various vineyards, cooperatives, a broker, the wine merchant Ducasse and the large cooperative Sieur d'Arques, were convicted of selling the equivalent of 18 million bottles of falsely labeled wine. The court gave them suspended jail sentences of between one and six months and fines from 3,000 to 180,000 euros. The judge said that, "the scale of the fraud caused severe prejudice to the wines of Languedoc in the United States."
The saga dates back to 2006 as demand for Pinot Noir was surging. Gallo had been working with a Limoux-based co-op, Sieur d’Arques, on various wines for Red Bicyclette, and asked for a Pinot. The co-op did not have enough of the grape variety, so it contacted Ducasse, a merchant house in Carcassonne, to help buy from other growers and producers.
In 2008, during an audit by the French fraud agency, officials found several inconsistencies. Ducasse had sold 53,889 hectoliters of Pinot Noir when the entire region only produces around 53,000 hectoliters a year. In addition, the wine had been sold for 58 euros per hectoliter, much less than the typical bulk-wine market price of 97 euros per hectoliter for Vin de Pays d’Oc Pinot Noir.
In January, all the suspects except two executives from Sieur d'Arques pled guilty. Prosecutors told the court that the scam produced 7 million euros in profit.
A Gallo vice president, Susan Hensley, released a statement saying, "We are deeply disappointed to learn today that our supplier Sieur d'Arques has been found guilty of selling falsely labeled French Pinot Noir as recently as March of 2008. Based on the available information of the Pinot Noir that the French courts have investigated, Gallo imported less than 20 percent of the total and is no longer selling any of this wine to customers."
Hensley added that they "believe that the only French Pinot Noir that was potentially misrepresented to us would have been the 2006 vintage and prior."
There has been no evidence that Gallo knew of any fraud. One industry executive familiar with Gallo's projects with foreign partners did note that the Modesto company requires strict production costs when working with partner wineries. Gallo has found new suppliers when those cost projections aren't met.
Back in France, the wine industry fears that the swindle could undermine the credibility of fellow French winegrowers.
The Spanish Table — Seattle, WA, USA — February 18, 2010 12:18pm ET
Tim Fish — Santa Rosa, CA — February 18, 2010 12:46pm ET
I asked Gallo about that specific issue but the company issued only a brief statement and failed to address it.
Greg Dunbar — Seattle, WA, USA — February 18, 2010 6:32pm ET
Having read Blood & Wine several years ago, I'm not at all surprised Gallo responded the way they did.
Eldon Lauber — Omaha, NE — February 18, 2010 10:34pm ET
I purchased some of this wine and it was way off in nose, taste and simply undrinkable. I poured several bottles down the drain and vowed never to purchase anymore. I commend Gallo for their response.
Jay Witcen — Fort Collins, CO — February 18, 2010 11:18pm ET
California law allows up to 25% of other varietals in it's wine. Many pinots from Cali. have syrah dumped in them to boost color and flavor. (I believe Oregon is only 10%.) So what is the diffence with the French Pinot/Merlot and a California Pinot/slash whatever? The law should be changed!
R J Larocca — United states — February 19, 2010 11:32am ET
Profit - 7 million euros
Fines - 2 million euros
Suspended sentences
A real disincentive to commit fraud!!!
Anton C Kowalski — Wichita, Kansas — February 19, 2010 11:45am ET
I remember when Gallo brought Red Bicyclette into our Kansas market in '07 or '08. I tasted the Merlot and Syrah and found the wines to be marginally marketable at best and refused to stock them. The Pinot Noir showed up in market about 6 months later, I told them not to bother me. Not surprising that Gallo is now distancing themselves from Sieur d’Arques and Ducasse but when the wines were first brought it in Gallo was singing their typical corporate tune of both the quality and saleability of the Red Bicyclette portfolio.
Brian Seal — Bentonville, Arkansas, USA — February 19, 2010 11:25pm ET
Ah well...anyone who buys a wine with a name or a producer such as this without doing any research on it is a sucker...Step it up a little folks...thats crap wine, and you all know it.
Igor Ostrovsky — Boston, MA — March 28, 2010 2:04pm ET
Jay Witcen,
You have a very valid point and I'm surprised that it has not been raised before. I say, if you're going to put a varietal on the label, it had better be 100%!
Want to join or start a discussion? Become a WineSpectator.com member and you can!
To protect the quality of our conversations, only members may submit comments. To learn more about member benefits, take our site tour.
Sips & Tips | Wine & Healthy Living
Video Theater | Collecting & Auctions
» View samples
» Or sign up now!
» Manage my newsletter preferences

The marketplace for all your wine needs, including:
Wine Storage | Wine Clubs
Dining & Travel | Wine Auctions
Wine Shops | Wine Accessories
What Susan Hensley fails to address is what steps have E&J Gallo taken to ensure that the rest of their import portfolio is true to the varietal listed on the label. Companies this big put huge pressures on their supply chain and then tend adopt a position that they are not responsible when a supplier cheats.