
• When former Alaska governor Sarah Palin announced her resignation in July 2009, she pledged she could make more of a difference on the issues that matter to her from outside Juneau. As she eloquently explained in her resignation speech: "It would be apathetic to just hunker down and 'go with the flow.' Nah, only dead fish 'go with the flow.'" But while political pundits predicted Palin's book tour and even her new gig as a commentator on Fox News, no one realized she would wade into the contentious issue of direct-to-consumer wine shipping. On Tuesday, the Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of America (WSWA) announced that Palin will be the keynote speaker at their annual convention in Las Vegas in April. In a statement, WSWA president Craig Wolf said, "Gov. Palin is a great supporter of America’s free enterprise system and understands that industries like the beverage alcohol industry play a key role in driving our national economy. We're proud and honored to welcome her as a speaker." Palin reportedly charges a $100,000 speaking fee. Unfiltered hopes to have a front-row seat. The WSWA is the country's biggest opponent of allowing wineries and retailers to ship wine directly to consumers, and it will be interesting to hear what a great supporter of free enterprise thinks of the current three-tier system.
• Just two days after the WSWA’s announcement, Unfiltered learned of some big news for wine-shipping supporters. Family Winemakers of California has won its lawsuit in federal appeals court against the state of Massachusetts, which has a 30,000-gallon cap limit for allowing wineries to ship to residents of the state. This decision continues the trend toward the abolishment of shipping bans. No word on whether direct-shipping proponents will book Champagne bottle-signing prankster and impeccable Palin impersonator Tina Fey for their annual direct-shipping symposium.

• In 2008, Unfiltered brought you the news of a dessert wine from The Rolling Stones. They’re back at it again, and they’ve brought some friends: Wines That Rock offers three varietals, each with a rock’n’roll-inspired label. Forty Licks Merlot features the classic Stones logo on the label; The Dark Side of the Moon Cabernet Sauvignon of course features Pink Floyd’s most famous album cover, and Woodstock Chardonnay pays tribute to the three-day festival of peace and music (among other things). The wine company began as a partnership between the rock business managers of RZO (who work with The Rolling Stones, David Bowie, Sting and U2) and Mendocino Wine Co. Also always music to Unfiltered’s ears, Wines That Rock embraces “green” practices, from use of solar and wind power at the winery to eco-friendly packaging. Cofounder Ron Roy said that "traditionally you create the wine and then name it based on its personality. With these wines, we developed a bottle that captured the attitude of the music." Unfiltered hopes a Loving Cup to drink it out of is in the works.
• When it comes to politics, Unfiltered has long believed that it’s not how you govern the country, it’s what you drink while you’re doing it. Unfortunately for Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, what he’s drinking and cellaring these days has drawn public scorn from Max Allen of the Weekend Australian and Nick Ryan of Gourmet Traveller. Australia’s Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee recently released a detailed list of the taxpayer-purchased wines kept at the PM’s official residences in Sydney and Canberra. The collection includes six-year-old Sauvignon Blancs and Viogniers whose age would make them "tired and flabby," according to Allen, and low-priced Sauvignon Blancs from New Zealand whose provenance, according to Ryan, is "grounds for treason." Ryan was particularly vitriolic in his assessment of the collection, calling it "boring as hell. The kind of list you'd find in a golf club full of retired Rotarians. A lot of tired old whites." Despite their harsh words, both writers acknowledged that former Prime Minister John Howard, who was known to prefer beer to wine, is truly to blame for the state of the official cellar. Sounds like Australia has a good place to start when they finally get around to dealing with that wine glut.
• After watching farm laborers toiling in Napa Valley vineyards on a hot day without shade, Napa Valley businessman Garth Patterson came up with an idea. Patterson invented the Cooling Station, a sort of trailer that provides relief for California’s farm workers from temperatures that often drift into the triple digits in the summer. The Cooling Station’s aluminum canopy provides shade and seating for 12 workers, while its NFL-quality misting fans can reduce surrounding temperatures by as much as 25 degrees. It includes an emergency shower, potable water and a first-aid box, all the materials required by OSHA at a vineyard site. “Although you are required to have shade, water and first-aid supplies all in one spot, employers are often hard-pressed to spend the money for all supplies and then keep them in one place,” Patterson said, explaining the merits of his invention. Operating costs are minimal, too, he said: “It runs for six to eight hours on just 1 gallon of gas.” But the estimated $20,000 price tag may be holding prospective buyers off. “Growers at this point seem somewhat reluctant to invest,” he noted, but he believes that the rental or lease business may end up being the best market for the Cooling Station. However it makes its way into vineyards this year, Unfiltered thinks it’s a pretty cool idea.
Jim Nuffield — Toronto — January 14, 2010 6:20pm ET
Brian Clouse — Philly — January 14, 2010 7:23pm ET
Wow, Jim. Do those comments reflect personal knowledge of the former Governor, her knowledge of the issues, and her actual propensity to learn, or are you just repeating what you've heard on TV?
Hitesh Patel — Ansonia, CT — January 14, 2010 8:18pm ET
Jim, I don't know if O'Bama's teleprompter is free that day...it has a busy work load talking for the President.
Brian, well done.
Paul Bursik — Green Bay — January 14, 2010 8:36pm ET
Brian, I imagine that nearly all of us are getting our knowledge from various media. The former Gov might know this issue well -- but I would think that a proponent of this issue would not be after a 6-figure payday in order to right this terrible injustice. Of course, many from both political persuasions seek such compensation. Bill Clinton is famous for generating speaking fees. Let's just not be hoodwinked into thinking that Sarah is somehow different and "pure." Indeed, at least Clinton waited until his term was over to cash in.
Jamie Sherman — Sacramento — January 14, 2010 8:46pm ET
I think that's funny as hell -- arguing about Sarah Palin. I know this, for 100,000 dollars, I think she's gonna say what she needs to say and maybe she'll get another gig.
Jim Faley — So.Cal. — January 15, 2010 12:19am ET
hmm who would attract more people to attend Nancy Pelosi or Sarah Palin? Palin is a hot ticket, she's inspirational and she will bring attention, it might make it on FOX news, and other media outlets...seems like a great call to get more exposure, as I douubt any of us had this annual convention on our calendars before this news item came out on WS.com. Cheers.
Ed Thralls — Atlanta, GA USA — January 15, 2010 9:43am ET
Interesting words from Craig, "America's free enterprise system", yet the 3-tier system and what the WSWA is fighting for actually restricts wineries from being a part of free enterprise by executing DTC transactions.
Michael Neeley — Everett, WA — January 15, 2010 3:05pm ET
Yes, she is still very much the politician. For $100K she'll say whatever they want her to say, and then afterward send out a press release explaining that her remarks do not contradict her previous postion. No further questions!
Paul H Egan — Lawrenceville, NJ — January 15, 2010 3:32pm ET
"It would be apathetic to just hunker down and 'go with the flow.' Nah, only dead fish 'go with the flow.'" That's all you need to know about the sheer intellect of Sarah Palin and her motivations. To say she's about as bright and well planned as a Avon lady does a great disservice to the good people of the Avon Corporation. At least they know how and when to speak.
Glen Schorzman — Marsing, Idaho — January 15, 2010 4:45pm ET
Gov Palin knows at least as much about wine (and free enterprise) as the current administration knows about economics and thermodynamics(energy), and $100K is a lot less than the government is pouring down the drain every minute.
Kctucker — Escondido, CA — January 15, 2010 7:21pm ET
To quote Rodney King: "Can't we just all get along?"
Dan Del Campo — Paso Robles CA — January 17, 2010 12:00pm ET
First off regarding the 100K fee.....or would you be happier if she spoke with no fee and said what she wanted? Or, would you prefer that she not even address the issue and spoke only about her book, the country and her future? And by the way Paul, you just keep buying those Avon products you seem to know so much about, or did they "pay" you to say that?
Joe Welborn — Charlotte,NC — January 18, 2010 12:02pm ET
Of all the names I'd use for Sarah Paling 'great' is not one that comes to mind, in anything.
Bert Pinheiro — Baltimore Maryland — January 18, 2010 12:42pm ET
I hope that in the future you will stick to wine issues that are not political. I can get this junk that you write about on TV. I could care less about yours or anyone elses political opinions no matter what party is involved. If you care to write about wine, I am sure we will all be interested but if not and you want to be political, than we can find other wine publications and internet options that stick to the topic we love.
Tony M Petito — Napa, Sonoma — January 18, 2010 2:40pm ET
Whoa, whoa, whoa... As a small wine business owner and also as a consumer let me say that "Unfiltered" needs to take a chill pill. WS is very much a for profit business, same as their other publications i.e., Cigar Aficionado, etc. Question - does everybody in your office support smoking rights for Cigar smokers? Of course not but they tow the party-line. So you can speak out of both sides of your mouth when you are part of the business community. I don't need a contrived civic lesson or a political opinion from some dolt (sic) columnist/journalist who never had to start a business and make a business run. Nor should we as subscribers/readers have to pay for that pandering political Op Ed puff piece.
Grow up and stop trying to feed us more of the media drivel about how good or bad Palin is for the wine industry, or the country. ALL politicians have strenghts and weaknesses, biases, agenda's and dreams just like the rest of us. She is no worse than many others on all sides of the political spectrum. Your preaching to the wrong audience 'pollyanna'.
Anthony Fiamma — New York — January 19, 2010 1:19am ET
Oh I see, if your Gov Palin you are mocked for working for your money, but if you slap a label of a popular band and throw the word Green around its then OK to charge insane amounts of money for a bottle of wine. I think the authors favorite verital is Kool Aid.
Jim Mcclure — DFW, Texas — January 19, 2010 12:34pm ET
I'm with those who would rather see WS "news" stick to covering wine related issues rather criticizing a politician for...I'm really not sure what. A turn of phrase that's beneath the column writer? Speaking at a convention on, as near as I can tell, an as yet undetermined topic? The article didn't say anything about her speaking in favor of the three tier system, or for that matter what topic she would be speaking on. I would think there would be a myriad of topics she could speak on, and unless there's been an announcement not mentioned in the article, it would be premature to say she "would wade into the contentious issue of direct-to-consumer wine shipping." Now would a blurb about her speaking there be appropriate? Yes, it's a wine related organization's gathering. To criticize her in the manner done here emphasizes what is seeming more and more to be an institutional political bias previously shown by a number of the editors where there need be none shown.
John Reeves — Texas — January 26, 2010 10:27am ET
Brian, that's a good one .... can I borrow it ?
If Sarah Palin speaks against allowing wineries and retailers to ship wine directly to consumers, she won't get my support for anything, much less as a seriously unqualified VP of the USA.
Alexandre Lockfeld — Eugene, Oregon USA — February 1, 2010 11:54pm ET
Wow, some other forums I've been on ban this kind of blatantly political commentary on the grounds it causes thread drift and flame wars. But then, they wouldn't have posted an article about such an inflammatory and polarizing subject as "the Palinator" ;-)
Don Rauba — Schaumburg, IL — April 16, 2010 4:32pm ET
I don't care at all what "Caribou Barbie" has to say about my rights as a consumer. This bill is out of line, and it's also going to hurt wineries sales. I should be able to purchase direct from wineries to fill the holes in my collection, which are wines not sold in stores (via distribution). Until ALL wines are made available for purchase through retail (and they're not now, nor will they ever be), this kind of bill is just wrong.
John Albritton — Irvine, CA — April 21, 2010 12:23am ET
Free the Grapes! has an action alert that will allow you to send a fax or email easily and for free to your representatives in Congress. Here is the link:
http://www.capwiz.com/freegrapes/issues/alert/?alertid=14948676
Tell a friend!
Want to join or start a discussion? Become a WineSpectator.com member and you can!
To protect the quality of our conversations, only members may submit comments. To learn more about member benefits, take our site tour.
Sips & Tips | Wine & Healthy Living
Video Theater | Collecting & Auctions
» View samples
» Or sign up now!
» Manage my newsletter preferences

The marketplace for all your wine needs, including:
Wine Storage | Wine Clubs
Dining & Travel | Wine Auctions
Wine Shops | Wine Accessories
Sarah Palin has no knowledge of the issue and is not smart enough to learn. She'll read someone else's writing and won't know why she's saying it.