Hello there! I'm Dr. Vinifera, or "Vinny" for short. Ask me your toughest wine questions, from the technical aspects of winemaking to the fine points of etiquette. I hope you find my answers educational and even amusing. Looking for a particular answer? Check my archive and my FAQs. You can also follow me on Twitter: @AskDrVinny.
Do you have a question for Dr. Vinny? Ask it here...
Dear Dr. Vinny,
Can you explain what "first-growth" means, and why these wines are considered better? Of all the literature I have read, I can't find a definition of this type of classification.
—D.B., Bronxville, N.Y.
When people say "first-growth," they're talking about Bordeaux, or at least alluding to it. In the Bordeaux Classification of 1855 (yes, we're talking about a term coined more than 150 years ago), wine brokers ranked châteaus based on reputation and price. The classification ranked them within "growths," or crus, from first down to fifth. The original classification included four first-growths: Lafite-Rothschild, Latour, Margaux and Haut-Brion. In 1973, Mouton-Rothschild was elevated to first-growth (or premier cru) status, making a grand total of five first-growths.
It's no surprise that since 1855, many changes have occurred in names, owners, vineyards and quality. While the ranking still has a big influence on the perception of quality, these days it's not unusual to see a second-growth, or even a wine from a source ignored by the classification system, fetching as high a score (or a price) as a first-growth.
Learn from the experts and get the most out of each sip. Take one of our online courses or take them all—from the ABCs of Tasting to in-depth seminars on Food Pairing, California Cabernet, Bordeaux, Tuscany, Sensory Evaluation and more.