Log In / Join Now

harvey steiman at large

Penfolds St. Henri Shiraz: Old School

Photo by: David Yellen

Posted: May 12, 2008 9:07am ET

For those who like to cellar wines instead of drinking them right away, Penfolds St. Henri Shiraz is just the thing. In some ways it's the polar opposite of Penfolds Grange, Australia's most famous (and extremely ageable) Shiraz. But while Grange tastes amazingly good upon release and continues to develop extra nuances in the bottle, St. Henri takes a few years to show what it has.

That point emerged clearly when I tasted 19 vintages of St. Henri with Penfolds winemaker Peter Gago on Saturday at his new tasting room at Magill Estate. The wines went back more than 50 years, and, as has been the case with every vertical tasting I've done of Grange over the years, nearly every vintage was still very much alive and worth drinking.

The sneaky little secret that so many savvy Australian wine collectors know is that, yes, St. Henri can age as long as Grange does. Check out my video for a look at the 1962 and 1956 vintages.



And you only have to pay a fraction of the price per bottle. Where Grange currently sells for $250 (maybe more, when Grange 2003 is released in the U.S. in June), St. Henri goes for $42.

If you opened a bottle of St. Henri on release, you would probably think, "OK, I got what I paid for; this is nice stuff, but where are the bells and whistles? Where is the complexity, the depth, those extra nuances?" But if you cellared it for, oh, 20 or 30 years, you might have something like the phenomenal 1976 (95 points, non-blind). My note: "Rich and meaty in flavor, with a gamy grace note to the vibrant blackcurrant and plum flavors, riding on a supple frame. Fine tannins, round and generous, with power and elegance. Just now developing an old-wine character. Almost under-developed for a 32-year-old wine. Spectacular."

Compare that to my published review of the St. Henri 2002 (90, $40): "Fresh, exuberant, juicy with blueberry and plum flavors, shaded with hints of white pepper and sage as the finish lingers against fine tannins." I liked it about two points better this time, in the context of its brethren, non-blind. The point is, it's all fruit and spice now, none of those extra nuances, none of the textural delights that come with age. That's why you cellar St. Henri.

St. Henri is the odd duck in the Penfolds high-end portfolio. Where Grange ages in American oak barrels and RWT in French barriques, St. Henri matures in large old oak vats that contribute no wood flavor. Where Grange is built around century-old vines in Barossa and RWT uses exclusively Barossa fruit, St. Henri comes from grapes sourced mostly from cooler parts of South Australia, notably Adelaide Hills, Coonawarra and Eden Valley.

This was intentional. The history of St. Henri predates Penfolds. It was originally made in the 19th century by Auldana, a vineyard and winery adjacent to Penfolds' Magill Estate in the near suburbs of Adelaide. Penfolds bought the property in 1944, and in the 1950s, while winemaker Max Schubert was creating Grange in part by introducing French oak barrels to dry red wine in Australia, another winemaker at Penfolds, John Deveran, re-created the original Auldana style.

Gago opened the Penfolds library's last bottle of Deveran's first try, an experimental 1956 never commercially released. It's still very much alive, with a phenomenal nose of dried cherries and caramel with touches of sweet earthiness. Very silky in texture, it was just delicious, with layers of flavor and it still showed a sense of freshness, 93 points, non-blind. The 1958 (85 points, non-blind) tastes much older.

My favorite wine in the tasting, and proof positive of the ageability of St. Henri, was the 1962, which I rated 97 points, non-blind, in half bottle (much better than a full-size bottle tasted first, fresher and more complete). It fills the mouth with cherry and hints of earth, and that signature roasted meat character. It showed great balance and intensity.

Other standouts for me were 1971, 1976 and 1986. More recent wines tasted too young. Even the 1971 (94 points, non-blind) felt tight and juicy, with plenty of savory notes, adding meaty, bacon-y touches to the black cherry and dried blueberry flavors at the center. The tannins are a tad aggressive. Maybe it just needs more time than the 37 years it's already had.

It's not that the unready wines are harsh or difficult to drink. On the contrary, they are really pleasant. But they get so much better with longer cellaring.

Of the younger wines, try to get your hands on 2002, 2001, 1996 and 1991, if you can find them. Preview tastings of 2004, 2005 and 2006 showed more intense, focused fruit flavors than I noticed in previous vintages, without losing that distinctive balance that trades South Australia's usual plushness for a more refreshing structure.

Auldana is long gone, having been swallowed up by Adelaide housing, but St. Henri remains as a reminder of Australia's old school winemaking. They had more patience in those days.

Dale Johnson
Steamboat Springs —  May 13, 2008 1:56am ET
Harvey,Can you expect the same age ability from the Magillas you've found in the St Henri.I've have some newerMagill vintages and was wandering how long to age them.DaleSteamboat Springs, Co
Mark Antonio
Tokyo —  May 13, 2008 11:07pm ET
Harvey, sorry to be off topic but your colleague James Molesworth asked me to seek your opinion on a ros¿'ve been lucky to try on many occasions but that hasn't ever shown up in any reviews in WS. Have you tried the Allegro Rose made by Castagna in Beechworth? What are your thoughts on it? Best regards, Mark Antonio
Richard Hirth
Michigan —  May 14, 2008 7:50am ET
I have a couple bottles each of the 00 and 01. Were they in your vertical? If so, how are they coming along and how many years until I should try one? Thanks!
Harvey Steiman
San Francisco, CA —  May 15, 2008 8:46am ET
Richard, the 2001 is sensational, one of my favorite wines in the tasting, and the 2000 was right behind it, despite being a maligned vintage. Both seems more generous and supple in texture than most, so they're actually approachable now. By all means open a bottle and see what you think, but try to keep a few for as long as you can stand it.
Harvey Steiman
San Francisco, CA —  May 15, 2008 8:48am ET
As far as I know, Castagna wines are not imported to the U.S. I wouldn't see them unless I had them here by chance in Australia. Sorry, Mark, I don't have any experience with the ros
Mark Antonio
Tokyo —  May 15, 2008 10:35pm ET
Harvey, definitely worth checking out the ros¿ made from 100% Shiraz from some of the same vines that go into their Genesis Syrah (also highly recommended).

Would you like to comment? Want to join or start a discussion?

Become a WineSpectator.com member and you can!
To protect the quality of our conversations, only members may submit comments. Member benefits include access to more than 315,000 reviews in our Wine Ratings Search; a first look at ratings in our Insider, Advance and Tasting Highlights; Value Wines; the Personal Wine List/My Cellar tool, hundreds of wine-friendly recipes and more.
Most Recent Posts

WineRatings+ app: Download now for 340,000+ ratings.