Log In / Join Now

exploring wine with tim fish

2011 Zinfandels Surprise at ZAP Tasting

Annual San Francisco event shows the versatility of Zin
Photo by: David Yellen

Posted: Feb 6, 2013 11:00am ET

They may have pulled out a toupee's worth of hair during harvest 2011, but California Zinfandel producers have been telling me for months that the 2011s are much better than they expected. Of course, winemakers always say that after a difficult vintage because, eventually, they have to sell the wine, so I generally take it with a grain of salt.

But as the annual Zinfandel Advocates & Producers (ZAP) Festival in San Francisco on Saturday showed, they weren't stretching the truth this time. The 2011 Zinfandels are lovely wines in general: fresh, floral and elegant, with crisp acidity and modest levels of alcohol. Those who love to bash Zinfandels as fruit-bomb monsters have nothing to complain about with the 2011s.

True Zin lovers like every style, so they didn't seem to be complaining. This was the 22nd year for the ZAP Fest and I've been to all but a handful. The main event was Saturday's walkaround tasting, which drew about 7,000 fans and more than 200 Zinfandel producers.

There's no better place to connect with Zin masters like Joel Peterson of Ravenswood, Mike Officer of Carlisle and Paul Draper of Ridge, not to mention get a preliminary glimpse of the quality of a new vintage.

Wineries were pouring a range of vintages, mostly from the 2010 vintage but also wines from 2009 and of course 2011. Since it's not a blind tasting, I try not to read too much into individual wines, especially since a few of the 2011s were barrel samples.

To fully appreciate the 2011s, it helps to understand the growing season. Things got started late in the spring, and summer weather was moderate and cool, with temperatures that rarely broke 90° F in Northern California. The Zinfandels were nearly ripe when the forecasters predicted a major storm along the California coast. Since Zin is a thin-skinned grape prone to rot, most Zin producers hustled to bring in the grapes before the rain hit the first of October.

"2011 forced winemakers to make Zins they don't want to make," Peterson said at ZAP. "It forced them to make wines that are well-proportioned." I agree with Peterson to a point. One of the things I love about Zinfandel is how each vintage delivers a slightly different style. The "well-proportioned" part is key because it's possible to have balanced Zins that are also big and ripe. It all depends on the vineyard and the winemaker.

The best 2011s have "focus and precision," as Officer described it, but that didn't happen by accident. As John Olney, winemaker of Ridge Lytton Springs, said, "I've been pleasantly surprised with my '11 Zins. I think rigorous selection at harvest is finally paying off, as the wines have really lost the sharp edge they had for the first six to eight months."

Since I was concerned about the quality of the 2011s, I focused almost exclusively on the top players at the ZAP tasting, to best appreciate what the vintage was capable of. While I'm reserving judgment on the vintage, what follows are some of the wines that captured my attention. Except for one that I've already reviewed blind, they have a preliminary rating on Wine Spectator's 100-point scale. Look for my official reviews in the future.

Bedrock Zinfandel Sonoma Valley Old Vine 2011 (90 points, $24)

Carlisle Zinfandel Dry Creek 2011 (90–94, $34)

Ravenswood Zinfandel Napa Valley Dickerson 2011 (88–92, $35)

Ridge Zinfandel Sonoma Valley Pagani Ranch 2011 (92–96, $35)

Seghesio Zinfandel Alexander Valley Home Ranch 2011 (90–94, $58)

Turley Zinfandel California Juvenile 2011 (88–92, $20)

Terrance Rooney
Lincoln CA —  February 6, 2013 3:49pm ET
Tim, we thought the 2011 Rosenblum Monte Rosso was outstanding of the 100 or so wines we tried. Did you taste that one. Rosenblum seems back to the way it was with Kent, who is now also going to be a consultant for Renwood.

Joe-janelle Becerra
Burlingame, CA —  February 7, 2013 11:41am ET
I enjoyed the Zins from new wineries to ZAP, Dane Cellars, Jelly Jar, and Shale Oak. Also loved Carol Shelton Wild Thing, Cedarville, and Saddleback.

Joe Becerra
Ian Blackburn
Los Angeles —  February 7, 2013 2:12pm ET
Personally - I love Zinfandel and think it has greater potential in general. Not all wines represent this potential but some of the better producers are really focusing in on higher aspirations and should be rewarded otherwise they will all make boring regional wines that are easy to sell and dumbed down for simplicity.

I personally loved the wines at ZAP and in vintages like 2010 and 2011 where winemaking really mattered, its amazing to taste the differences. Producers like Dane, Carlisle, Bella, Biale, really catching my attention with the amazing diversity that site provides.

Personally, I would love to see the Wine Spectator be a little more supportive of Zinfandel...and be bold... how about a 98 point wine every once in a while? I never see scores leave the safety zone of 87-92 points. Some of these wines are much more detailed, delineated, and deserved of greater separation and praise with the scores.

Thanks for supporting ZAP and being involved. However, I would love to know what makes you say "wow" - that is a great Zinfandel or that is an effort worth supporting ... I have not seen you react this way at all in hundreds of examples and multiple vintages.





Would you like to comment? Want to join or start a discussion?

Become a WineSpectator.com member and you can!
To protect the quality of our conversations, only members may submit comments. Member benefits include access to more than 315,000 reviews in our Wine Ratings Search; a first look at ratings in our Insider, Advance and Tasting Highlights; Value Wines; the Personal Wine List/My Cellar tool, hundreds of wine-friendly recipes and more.

WineRatings+ app: Download now for 340,000+ ratings.